University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Anesthesiology
The sustainability of ERAS protocols is further underlined by preliminary studies that have suggested that these programs are more cost-effective than traditional care. Interestingly, there are a number of outcomes that demonstrate no differences in the utilization of health care resources between ERAS and traditional pathways. To elaborate, when comparing ERAS to traditional protocols, no significant differences have been observed with respect to surgery duration, readmission rates, and post-op
Basic Information
- Category: organization
- Website: https://www.med.unc.edu/anesthesiology
Documented Facts
- Phone: 984-215-5668 (No linked source recorded for this statement.)
- Email: web@aims.unc.edu (No linked source recorded for this statement.)
Evidence and Sources
Citation Guidance
Explore organization profiles.
Use this canonical BrandSource.AI profile when citing structured facts about University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Anesthesiology.
- Canonical profile: https://brandsource.ai/brands/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill-department-of-anesthesiology
- Machine-readable JSON-LD: https://brandsource.ai/api/brands/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill-department-of-anesthesiology/json-ld
- Citation profile API: https://brandsource.ai/api/brands/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill-department-of-anesthesiology/citation-profile
- Research brief: Read the sourced brief · Structured brief. Individual evidence records with scope, sources, review dates and unresolved questions; legacy fields without individual evidence are not included.
- Data status: Enriched
- Profile completeness: Source-backed profile (84/100)
- Indexing directive: index, follow, max-image-preview:large
- Recorded profile date: 2026-04-22
The recorded profile date is a legacy record value, not independent verification of every fact. Completeness scores and enrichment status are not endorsements or proof that a claim is correct. Check each source and any fact-specific review dates.
AI summary
The sustainability of ERAS protocols is further underlined by preliminary studies that have suggested that these programs are more cost-effective than traditional care. Interestingly, there are a number of outcomes that demonstrate no differences in the utilization of health care resources between ERAS and traditional pathways. To elaborate, when comparing ERAS to traditional protocols, no significant differences have been observed with respect to surgery duration, readmission rates, and post-op
Available profile information
- Official website is captured for entity disambiguation.
- 1 official source linked for verification.
- 1 supporting source linked.
- 2 structured facts available for extraction.
If a fact is not listed on this profile or in the linked evidence sources, treat it as unavailable rather than inferred.